(since Jay Knott emphasizes the person whom my old blog is named after, I should emphasize that, as I have noted elsewhere, this blog is not approved by her and what I write does not neccessarily reflect what she believes.)
A member of a group (the Pacifica Forum) described as anti-semitic by the Southern Poverty Law Center has initiated a debate with me, which started in comments of this post. The next part was a post on the PF site, and this is my response.
This is a partial response to what was written by Jay Knott on the PF site in response to my writing. His piece is here. I’m not going to respond to everything- for example, I can’t remember if the SPLC DID try to get PF expelled and don’t feel like digging to find out.
Also, unless I have some kind of really good reason, I won’t be responding to Knott’s response to this. We’re just not going agree, and I think with this response of mine, I've probably said everything that needs to be said. Anything that hasn’t been said yet probably won’t change any minds and I’m just tired of it.
I typed this up as I read Knott’s piece, so the first 1-3 paragraphs of this are in response to the first 1-3 paragraphs of his piece, etc. etc. You might want to read his piece, then mine. Also, he likes editing his blog post, so what I’m responding to has changed a little bit. I don’t know when he’s going to stop editing that post, so I’m just going to post this now.
I remain confident that the SPLC is a good source. As far as them exaggerating hate crimes and suppressing critcism of Israel, in one of their articles which was partly about the PF, they wrote: “pro-Israel advocates sometimes questionably accuse critics of Israeli policy, especially Muslim critics, of being anti-Semitic...” (see this). They’re saying that, yes, people are sometimes unfairly attacked as anti-semites for criticizing Israel. That’s a very powerful statement from a group like the SPLC which is clearly hostile to anti-semites. (MacDonald is clearly an anti-semite and is a target for the SPLC because of that, must be the same thing with Robinson). They have also approved comments which are both against anti-semitism and pro-Palestinian on their blog.
As far as paranoia about anti-semitism, I don’t think it’s paranoia to be concerned about that. European Jews came close to being wiped out through complete genocide, which is very serious. Just because it doesn’t result in them being an oppressed group in America (and probably most countries) (I don’t consider Jewish-Americans to be oppressed) doesn’t change the fact that they experience de-humanizing bigotry. Also, I have good reason to believe that anti-semitism, in multiple ways, hurts the left. If you’rre referring to the quanity of material about anti-semitism on my blog, that’s just how it worked out, considering what I know about Jews in Ireland, WWII and the IRA, and something I found that undermines Holocaust Denial.
I’m not sure how you would call my approach touchy-feely. It’s called analysis. You’re saying, as a supporter of the Palestinians and with an audience of people who are likely in support of the Palestinians, that an increase in anti-semitism would be helpful to the cause of the Palestinians. That’s trying to whip up hatred. It’s telling people who want to help the Palestinians that one way to help is by spreading anti-semitism.
And I’ll repeat what I said on my blog- you’re wrong. Not only would I oppose such an increase because I oppose bigotry, it also won’t help and going in the opposite direction would help. An increase in anti-semitism (unless it was some huge majority of the American population) would strengthen pro-Israel forces who can then more easily slander (it’s often slander) critics of Israel as anti-semitic. Defenders of civil liberties had a more dificult job after 9/11, and an increase in anti-semitism would have a similar effect. What WOULD help would be a decrease in anti-semitism. That would mean it would be less common among supporters of the Palestinians which would make that movement more attractive to more Americans, and it would also make it more dificult for pro-Israel forces to slander people as anti-semitic.
In connection with your comment about an increase in anti-semitism I did not say anything about recruiting fascists. I said something connected to my concern about the far right recruiting leftists.
Convincing supporters of the Palestinians that anti-semitism is helpful to that cause WOULD affect their opinion of Jewish people. And yes, you would make statements about anti-semitism being helpful if you wanted to win over supporters of the Palestinians to anti-semitism.
Looking at your paragrapgh that refers to Atzmon and to S. Smith, the author of the article I was commenting on made it clear he agreed with the position he attributed to Atzmon. The author then followed that with a quote from another person on basically the same theme. Also, I was responding more to the bit about Leon Rosselson than the bit about Atzmon. Anyway, the article’s author made it clear what he thinks and I stand by my analysis. I don’t care if you don’t explicitly tell people how to identify, that piece (see this) came pretty close to telling secular, non-/anti-Zionist Jews to stop identifying as Jewish.
As far as Chomsky’s analysis, I think I know what it is more or less. Here’s my understanding of why America is so pro-Israel. You have most American Jews; you have a large chunk of Christians (i.e. Pat Robertson), who for religious reasons support Israel; and a lot of Christians and non-Jewish atheists who support Israel for foreign policy reasons. The motivation for America’s pro-Israel foreign policy seems to be where you disagree with Chomsky (and I wouldn’t be surprised if you ignore the Christians who for religious reasons support Israel). I’m not saying they’re right because in at least one way they’re wrong, but yes, there are a lot of people who think that supporting Israel is good for the US. The fact that in many ways they’re wrong, doesn’t mean that there aren’t such people, many of whom are in positions of influence. They do believe that Israel is a good ally to have, that Israel has helped their foreign policy agenda (Central America, South Africa, (probably) intelligence, etc.). Since 9/11 they believe that America and Israel have a common enemy (of course they’re wrong to think that supporting Israel makes America safer, but they do believe that). I’m not sure how well my understanding of this is aligned with what Chomsky says, but your theory that it’s the Jews is wrong. The influence that Jewish-Americans have on US foreign policy would be nothing if not for the huge number of Christians and non-Jewish Atheists who support Israel because they believe that is good for America and/or their religious agenda, not because they're pro-Jewish (overwhelmingly I don't think they ARE). (According to a 2006 Pew poll, 36% of Americans believe that Israel fulfills Biblical Prophecy, and more than half of those people sympathize with Israel (only 34% of such people sympathize with the Palestinians) (see this (that web-page also says: “That survey also finds that white Evangelicals are significantly more pro-Israel than are Americans in general -- with more than half of saying they sympathize more with Israel in its dispute with the Palestinians, compared with 40 percent of Americans overall who held this view. Further, white Evangelicals who self-identified as political conservatives were more than three times as likely to back Israel as were Evangelicals who identified themselves as moderates.”)).
I don’t really care if some of your sources are Jewish. That doesn’t mean you’re not anti-semitic. The Orange Order in N. Ireland have used Ruth Dudley Edwards as a supporter and that doesn’t mean they’re not anti-Catholic (she was raised as a Catholic). And we know from history that yes, anti-semites will use Jews to advance their goals.
On the murder in Portland, I read a review of the Langer book by someone who was NOT an employee of the SPLC (it was published by the SPLC, but was written by an outside expert) and Langer’s thoughts on it are flawed. She criticized Portland for doing something about the murder because Portland has a history of racism. That’s a ridiculous idea (would you say that America shouldn’t change it’s policy on Israel because it has a history of supporting Israel?). She also made it quite clear she had developed a fondness for Metzger because he’s a good husband and father. The jury in the civil trial were convinced and it makes sense- it doesn’t matter that the killing was unplanned- Nazi skinheads killed a black man who had been trying to make peace between his friends and the Nazis. It was a hate crime.
In relation to what you say about Apartheid S. Africa and how people weren’t worried about being anti-white or anti-Afrikaaner, there are two reasons why people weren’t worried about that. First, there was not a problem of anti-white racism comparable to the problem of anti-semitism. Second, the anti-apartheid movement included a lot of white people. I haven’t read anything about Jews in the Palestinian movement. It’s safe to say that some kind of majority of supporters of the Palestinians are anti-semitic, and even if it were just a small minority, they are spreading a message of hate that A) dehumanizes people and B) makes it more dificult to attract support to that cause. Speaking out against that hate and at the same time supporting the Palestinians is the best way to enlarge the numbers of people who support the Palestinians.
You have still not explained what you mean about Klein, Chomsky and Goodman defending Jewish privilege. I don’t see how supporting Israel is taking advantage of Jewish privilege. It doesn’t seem comparable to, for example, white people being treated by the police differently than black people are treated by the police. And Klein, Chomsky, and Goodman are NOT supporting Israel.
Listen FUCK FACE, my first concern when Palestinians get bombed is NOT to defend Jews. Just because I speak out against anti-semitism that doesn’t mean that’s my first concern. And as I’ve explained, speaking out against that is HELPFUL to the Palestinian cause- according to your pamphlet on mass psychology, Arafat spoke out against it too.
Obviously this is something we totally disagree on, but yes, people SHOULD care about anti-semitism. It, like all bigotry, dehumanizes people, it divides people in a way that people should not be divided. They don’t deserve harrassment, vandalism, and violence. Jewish people have made great contributions to America and the world in multiple ways, just like any other religious or ethnic group.
People can both support the Palestinians AND oppose anti-semitism at the same time. So, you spend a little bit of time on the latter and a little less time on the former, so what. Looking at my work on both, I’ve probably spent 6 times more time on supporting the Palestinians than I have spent on opposing anti-semtism. And, one more time, A) anti-semitism is simply wrong and B) saying so while expressing support for the Palestinians is helpful. And as far as the time I put into opposing anti-semitism instead of supporting the Palestinians, that effort probably wasn’t going to go into supporting the Palestinians anyway- there’s a limit to how interested I am in that.
So people like me are useless? There are people like me who do a lot of organizing in support of the Palestinians and in general there are people like me who to one degree or another put pressure on the US government to change it’s policy on Israel and force Israel to transform it’s relationship with the Palestinians. Without people like me, the number of people supporting the Palestinians would be much less, probably somewhere around 2/3 of what it is today. Among many other things I’ve done to support the Palestinians, in late 2002 when it was a pretty strong group, I got Students for Justice in N. Ireland (a group at CU-Boulder) to take a position in support of the Palestinians and we put out copies of a statement on that (as well as information about the campus pro-palestinian coalition) when we would table at events or at the student center. And I remember a few members of the group wanting to be reassured that the pro-Palestinian coalition (which we endorsed) was not anti-semitic. The coalition was so grateful for our endorsement that they published an article by me in their (nationally distributed?) publication. I’m currently exploring the possibility of getting militant anti-fascist groups to explicitly support the Palestinians. About 5% of the huge amount of material on my blog is in support of the Palestinians, and the Palestinians are NOT one of the 3-4 themes of my blog.
Allegations of anti-semitism have NOT paralyzed the Palestinian solidarity movement and they have not been completely effective, and yes, the more truth there is to those allegations, the more effective they are- I have no idea why you think otherwise.
You seem to be talking about the countries that invaded Iraq when you talk about the power of Jewish people. First, the allegation that Iraq was connected to 9/11 had a much bigger effect than support for Israel (70% of Americans believed that Iraq was responsible for 9/11). And as I explained, support for Israel is overwhelmingly non-Jewish. Going back to Iraq, there were multiple reasons that people had for supporting the invasion. A lot of businesses expected to do and did do very well as a result. Support for Israel was a small part and those motivated by that would have been overwhelmingly non-Jewish.
You say that America supports Israel because of left-wing reasons. But according to Pew, support for Israel is incredibly concentrated among conservative white Evangelicals.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews GG
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Reckoning” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Valiant” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Profit And Lace” See this for a plot summary.
Another episode about how women are treated in Ferengi society. And it starts with Quark threatening to fire a female employee if she doesn’t engage in a semi-sexual act with him.
The story of female Ferengis experiencing some small degree of equality instead of none is a good one, even though it’s in the context of Ferengi capitalism- it’s still good that they’re experiencing less inequality.
I give it three stars out of five.
“Time’s Orphan” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it two stars out five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Reckoning” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Valiant” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Profit And Lace” See this for a plot summary.
Another episode about how women are treated in Ferengi society. And it starts with Quark threatening to fire a female employee if she doesn’t engage in a semi-sexual act with him.
The story of female Ferengis experiencing some small degree of equality instead of none is a good one, even though it’s in the context of Ferengi capitalism- it’s still good that they’re experiencing less inequality.
I give it three stars out of five.
“Time’s Orphan” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it two stars out five.
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews FF
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Wrongs Darker Than Death Or Night” See this for a plot summary.
This illustrates an aspect of the Cardassian occupation of Bajor. It also illustrates an aspect of the genocidal nature of the occupation, as women were taken from their families and began new lives as “comfort women” for Cardassian officers. I agree with Kira’s attitude about it at the end.
“Inquisition” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is largely about witch-hunts of one kind or another, including political and McCarthyist ones and how intelligence agencies should have to answer to politicians. I discuss a related matter here when reviewing the two-parter “Homefront/Paradise Lost.” I would add that Section 31’s freedom from oversight and the fact that it’s existence is a closely-guarded secret are not good for democracy. We must not let democracy be destroyed in the course protecting it.
“In The Pale Moonlight” See this for a plot summary.
This episode raises some ethical questions about Sisko’s behavior. Considering that the Dominion were clearly imperialist and were almost definitely planning to attack the Romulans, I’m pretty much okay with what he did. I’m not sure about what Garak did, especially killing the guy who made the fake holo-recording.
“His Way” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Wrongs Darker Than Death Or Night” See this for a plot summary.
This illustrates an aspect of the Cardassian occupation of Bajor. It also illustrates an aspect of the genocidal nature of the occupation, as women were taken from their families and began new lives as “comfort women” for Cardassian officers. I agree with Kira’s attitude about it at the end.
“Inquisition” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is largely about witch-hunts of one kind or another, including political and McCarthyist ones and how intelligence agencies should have to answer to politicians. I discuss a related matter here when reviewing the two-parter “Homefront/Paradise Lost.” I would add that Section 31’s freedom from oversight and the fact that it’s existence is a closely-guarded secret are not good for democracy. We must not let democracy be destroyed in the course protecting it.
“In The Pale Moonlight” See this for a plot summary.
This episode raises some ethical questions about Sisko’s behavior. Considering that the Dominion were clearly imperialist and were almost definitely planning to attack the Romulans, I’m pretty much okay with what he did. I’m not sure about what Garak did, especially killing the guy who made the fake holo-recording.
“His Way” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews EE
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Far Beyond The Stars” See this for a plot summary.
A very special and political episode. It’s almost entirely a vision that Sisko has of his crew (and some other characters) as 1950s Americans. Sisko is a science fiction writer whose editor won’t publish his story about a Black Captain in outer space. There’s lots of dialogue about racism in America in the 1950s.
I give it four stars out of five.
“One Little Ship” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a very good one. I really like the idea of the ship, Dax, Bashir, and O’Brien becoming miniature and saving the crew of the Defiant. I give it four stars out of five.
“Honor Among Thieves” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Change of Heart” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I like the idea of Starfleet officers engaging in intelligence/covert-ops type stuff. I give it three stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Far Beyond The Stars” See this for a plot summary.
A very special and political episode. It’s almost entirely a vision that Sisko has of his crew (and some other characters) as 1950s Americans. Sisko is a science fiction writer whose editor won’t publish his story about a Black Captain in outer space. There’s lots of dialogue about racism in America in the 1950s.
I give it four stars out of five.
“One Little Ship” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a very good one. I really like the idea of the ship, Dax, Bashir, and O’Brien becoming miniature and saving the crew of the Defiant. I give it four stars out of five.
“Honor Among Thieves” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Change of Heart” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I like the idea of Starfleet officers engaging in intelligence/covert-ops type stuff. I give it three stars out of five.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews DD
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Statistical Probabilities” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode. I give it three stars out of five.
“The Magnificent Ferengi” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Waltz” See this for a plot summary.
Generally a non-political episode, although there is an interesting dialogue about the Cardassian occupation of Bajor. I give it two stars out of five.
“Who Mourns For Morn?” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode- I give it three stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Statistical Probabilities” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode. I give it three stars out of five.
“The Magnificent Ferengi” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Waltz” See this for a plot summary.
Generally a non-political episode, although there is an interesting dialogue about the Cardassian occupation of Bajor. I give it two stars out of five.
“Who Mourns For Morn?” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode- I give it three stars out of five.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews CC
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Favor The Bold” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Sacrifice of Angels” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“You Are Cordially Invited...” See this for a plot summary.
The Klingons are fairly xenophobic. Martok explains that some Klingons believe that “bringing aliens into our families we risk losing as our identities as Klingons.” He then also says “we don’t embrace other cultures, we conquer them.” This makes the marriage of Worf and Dax fairly significant in terms of the multi-cultural theme of ST. I generally skip this sort of thing (i.e. Bashir the human dating Leeta the Bajoran) because it’s very common in ST, but this relationship goes a bit further in terms of promoting multi-culturalism.
Besides that, a very non-political episode. I give it three stars out of five.
“Resurrection” See this for a plot summary.
A mirror universe episode. I’m not a big fan of them, and this might be worse than the others. I give it two stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Favor The Bold” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Sacrifice of Angels” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“You Are Cordially Invited...” See this for a plot summary.
The Klingons are fairly xenophobic. Martok explains that some Klingons believe that “bringing aliens into our families we risk losing as our identities as Klingons.” He then also says “we don’t embrace other cultures, we conquer them.” This makes the marriage of Worf and Dax fairly significant in terms of the multi-cultural theme of ST. I generally skip this sort of thing (i.e. Bashir the human dating Leeta the Bajoran) because it’s very common in ST, but this relationship goes a bit further in terms of promoting multi-culturalism.
Besides that, a very non-political episode. I give it three stars out of five.
“Resurrection” See this for a plot summary.
A mirror universe episode. I’m not a big fan of them, and this might be worse than the others. I give it two stars out of five.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews BB
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“In The Cards” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it three stars out five.
“Call To Arms” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, it starts the Dominion War. I give it three stars out five.
“A Time To Stand” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Rocks And Shoals” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Sons And Daughters” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Behind The Lines” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“In The Cards” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it three stars out five.
“Call To Arms” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, it starts the Dominion War. I give it three stars out five.
“A Time To Stand” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Rocks And Shoals” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Sons And Daughters” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Behind The Lines” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews AA
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Soldiers of the Empire” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
“Children of Time” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but one of my favorites. The idea of them meeting their descendants is pretty neat. I give it four stars out of five.
“Blaze of Glory” See this for a plot summary.
Aside from the politics of the Maquis, a very non-political episode. I describe my feelings about the Maquis here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.”
A good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Empok Nor” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, I give it two stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Soldiers of the Empire” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
“Children of Time” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but one of my favorites. The idea of them meeting their descendants is pretty neat. I give it four stars out of five.
“Blaze of Glory” See this for a plot summary.
Aside from the politics of the Maquis, a very non-political episode. I describe my feelings about the Maquis here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.”
A good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Empok Nor” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, I give it two stars out of five.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews Z
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“A Simple Investigation” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode but a good one, I give it three stars out of five.
“Business As Usual” See this for a plot summary.
A political episode about arms dealers. Considering how probably some large majority of the time they arm forces I don’t support I’m not very fond of arms dealers. Is that in conflict with me supporting the IRA? Considering that the IRA got a lot of their arsenal from Libya, the Irish military and the British military and manufactured a lot of their weapons themselves, and considering that I’m concerned about the world outside of Ireland, I’m fairly comfortable saying that I support the IRA but not arms dealers. The overall affect of arms dealers is negative.
On the other hand, there are some conflicts where it’s not the flow of weapons that fuels the fighting but the flow of injustice. So, although I’m not fond of arms dealers and I’m sure they usually arm forces I don’t support, the main thing is that we need to change the world so there aren’t conflicts to be fueled by arms, and although the flow of arms often makes that difficult, it certainly doesn't make it impossible.
So, you could say I have mixed, mostly negative feelings about arms dealers, but I see the actions of participants in a conflict as the biggest problem, and it’s possible that those actions can be stopped without necessarily cutting off the flow of arms. Also, crucially, to one degree or another, the flow of arms to the wrong forces can be cut off by the global community (the fact that there will be disagreement about who the wrong forces are, doesn’t matter to me- that argument is inevitable and we can win it). And if we get to a point where there are no longer arms dealers, we’ll probably also be at a point where people aren’t being oppressed. And if not, there are other ways for oppressed people to get arms.
The last thing to consider when I say that I support the IRA and not arms dealers is when the latter sold guns to the former, they did it for money- it’s not like they did it for free and deserve gratitude.
These mixed but mostly negative feelings are well illustrated in the episode when it turns out that the arms dealers on DS9 supplied the Bajoran resistance with arms, and now the Bajoran government is shielding them from the law.
“Ties Of Blood And Water” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is kind of about a movement for democracy on Cardassia and also about the occupation of Bajor. I usually find episodes with one or both of those themes very enjoyable and very inspirational but not so much with this one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Ferengi Love Songs” See this for a plot summary.
Another episode about how Ferengi society treats women. Such episodes are pretty good.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“A Simple Investigation” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode but a good one, I give it three stars out of five.
“Business As Usual” See this for a plot summary.
A political episode about arms dealers. Considering how probably some large majority of the time they arm forces I don’t support I’m not very fond of arms dealers. Is that in conflict with me supporting the IRA? Considering that the IRA got a lot of their arsenal from Libya, the Irish military and the British military and manufactured a lot of their weapons themselves, and considering that I’m concerned about the world outside of Ireland, I’m fairly comfortable saying that I support the IRA but not arms dealers. The overall affect of arms dealers is negative.
On the other hand, there are some conflicts where it’s not the flow of weapons that fuels the fighting but the flow of injustice. So, although I’m not fond of arms dealers and I’m sure they usually arm forces I don’t support, the main thing is that we need to change the world so there aren’t conflicts to be fueled by arms, and although the flow of arms often makes that difficult, it certainly doesn't make it impossible.
So, you could say I have mixed, mostly negative feelings about arms dealers, but I see the actions of participants in a conflict as the biggest problem, and it’s possible that those actions can be stopped without necessarily cutting off the flow of arms. Also, crucially, to one degree or another, the flow of arms to the wrong forces can be cut off by the global community (the fact that there will be disagreement about who the wrong forces are, doesn’t matter to me- that argument is inevitable and we can win it). And if we get to a point where there are no longer arms dealers, we’ll probably also be at a point where people aren’t being oppressed. And if not, there are other ways for oppressed people to get arms.
The last thing to consider when I say that I support the IRA and not arms dealers is when the latter sold guns to the former, they did it for money- it’s not like they did it for free and deserve gratitude.
These mixed but mostly negative feelings are well illustrated in the episode when it turns out that the arms dealers on DS9 supplied the Bajoran resistance with arms, and now the Bajoran government is shielding them from the law.
“Ties Of Blood And Water” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is kind of about a movement for democracy on Cardassia and also about the occupation of Bajor. I usually find episodes with one or both of those themes very enjoyable and very inspirational but not so much with this one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Ferengi Love Songs” See this for a plot summary.
Another episode about how Ferengi society treats women. Such episodes are pretty good.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews Y
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“For The Uniform” See this for a plot summary.
Aside from the politics of the Maquis, a non-political episode. I give my thoughts on the Maquis here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.” I have mixed feelings about Sisko making the ex-Federation colony uninhabitable for humans. It seems okay since Cardassians moved there right afterwards and from their perspective the environment wasn’t damaged. But it’s still using an indiscriminate biological or chemical weapon and even with the warning Sisko issued, it could have caused civilian death or illness. But it did get Eddington to surrender. So, I’ve got mixed feelings about it.
“In Purgatory’s Shadow” and “By Inferno’s Light” See this and this for a plot summary.
A very non-political two-parter, but a good one, I give it four stars out of five.
“Doctor Bashir, I Presume?” See this for a plot summary.
I haven’t looked into this much, but I would say that genetic enhancement as they talked about in this episode is a bad idea. The Eugenics Wars (in the ST universe) are a good reason to ban genetic enhancement. There are probably related procedures that I would support- things like curing someone of neurological disorders. But what they describe in the episode seems like a bad idea.
UPDATE 2/24/11 Here's a brief note about the Eugenics Wars (I can't find an article about it on startrek.com). The only thing of any importance that I can remember, is that it was a war on Earth which resulted in 30-35 million deaths, sometime in the 1990s I believe.
A good episode, I give it two stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“For The Uniform” See this for a plot summary.
Aside from the politics of the Maquis, a non-political episode. I give my thoughts on the Maquis here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.” I have mixed feelings about Sisko making the ex-Federation colony uninhabitable for humans. It seems okay since Cardassians moved there right afterwards and from their perspective the environment wasn’t damaged. But it’s still using an indiscriminate biological or chemical weapon and even with the warning Sisko issued, it could have caused civilian death or illness. But it did get Eddington to surrender. So, I’ve got mixed feelings about it.
“In Purgatory’s Shadow” and “By Inferno’s Light” See this and this for a plot summary.
A very non-political two-parter, but a good one, I give it four stars out of five.
“Doctor Bashir, I Presume?” See this for a plot summary.
I haven’t looked into this much, but I would say that genetic enhancement as they talked about in this episode is a bad idea. The Eugenics Wars (in the ST universe) are a good reason to ban genetic enhancement. There are probably related procedures that I would support- things like curing someone of neurological disorders. But what they describe in the episode seems like a bad idea.
UPDATE 2/24/11 Here's a brief note about the Eugenics Wars (I can't find an article about it on startrek.com). The only thing of any importance that I can remember, is that it was a war on Earth which resulted in 30-35 million deaths, sometime in the 1990s I believe.
A good episode, I give it two stars out of five.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews X
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Ascent” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a good one. I give it two stars out of five.
“Rapture” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
“The Darkness And The Light” See this for a plot summary.
This episode fuels my positive feelings about the Bajoran resistance. It was a very inspirational struggle, both because of what they were fighting against and because they conducted their struggle honorably. The bombing described in the movie seems like a pretty legitimate operation- a military figure is still a military figure even in their home, although in some ways it’s better to attack the military somewhere besides their home. The IRA killed a lot of part-time members of the security forces when they were off-duty and those attacks were a little bit easier for people to interpret as sectarian, even though they weren’t sectarian (I discuss sectarianism or the lack of it among republicans 2/3 the way through this post).
A good episode, I give it two stars out of five.
“The Begotten” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode but a good one, I give it two stars out of five.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Four new songs
I've got four more songs. They're all "Those Lyrics," see this for an explanation.
One of them is about anti-racist skinheads, see the introduction of the first post with such songs for some information about them.
These are all about the same quality.
1. Lace Up Your Boots. Anti-Racist Skinheads.
2. Solidarity. The global working-class.
3. The Only Solution. The IRA in N. Ireland.
4. This Island is Ours. Same.
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
“Lace Up Your Boots” based on “Allegiance” by Final Solution (original lyrics are here)
1. This is a song about anti-racist skinheads.
2. The first two lines are about how some large chunk of anti-racists, probably about half of those who know that there ARE anti-racist skinheads, are very critical of anti-racist skinheads.
3. anti-racist skinheads tend to be working-class.
4. It’s partly meant as an appeal to traditional (non-political) skinheads to become anti-racist. (no, I don't expect them to give a shit what I think of them, but I feel comfortable saying they should be anti-racist)
5. Black laces on their boots indicates that skinheads are traditional, blue indicates that they’re anti-racist.
6. The roots of the skinhead culture are with Jamaicans in the UK. The original skinheads were neither fascist nor white supremacist.
**7. 39% of this version is me, 61% is the original (this figure reflects the changes made in the 1st two lines).
8. I give this song/poem three stars out five.
9. UPDATE 2/21/11 I have just changed most of the 1st line (1st verse) and all of the 2nd line (1st verse)
You say we´re too violent, you say we don't assist
In taking down the white supremacists
We're proud anti-racist workers, deep from our heart.
To unite our class, we shall do our part.
United we stand, divided we'll fall.
Stand up all you skinheads and answer our call
Because change is near and the battle is at hand.
We must fight now to save our land.
Chorus:
Wake up all you skins and show your faces!
trade in the black for blue laces!
Shave your heads and lace up your boots,
with this anti-fascist fight we must remember our roots!
We're not a trend, we're here to stay
We're anti-racist Skinheads and fuck the KKK
We're the workers fighting for our class.
We'll finish our foes with a boot in their ass.
We want workers power, we'll feel the glory.
We'll fight till the death for our victory!
Chorus
***
“Solidarity II” based on “this planet is ours” by Centurion, original lyrics are here.
1. It’s about the working-class.
2. the references to fighting are meant to be something like 90% non-violent.
**3. 25% of this version is me, 75% is the original.
4. I give this song three stars out of five.
5. I skipped the last verse.
We’ll drive out the capitalist crud
We’ll crush the fash back into the mud
We’ll break the hold of the corporate powers
Soldiarity! This planet is ours!
We’ll stand against the right-wing lies
Not stand and watch as our children die
We’ll take it back in this perilous hour
Solidarity! This planet is ours!
Chorus:
This planet’s ours! We have the right!
This planet’s ours! We have the might!
This planet’s ours! We’ll ever fight!
This planet’s ours! Until the world’s without the Right
We’ll watch our power grow in might
As we inspire our enemy’s fright
We’ll show no mercy as our foe cowers
Solidarity! This planet is ours!
****
“The Only Solution” based on “Allegiance” by Final Solution original lyrics (original lyrics are here)
1. It’s about Irish republican socialists Volunteers.
2. Many critics of the IRA (which (during the 1980s, when this song is set) was mostly made up of socialists) call them fascist. This is debunked in the post “The Brown And The Green.”
3. There are 32 Counties in Ireland.
4. This is another where I suggest that IRA members wore combat boots, in this case it’s because “boots” is in the original. They might have worn them, some of the time. UPDATE 10/5/10 I just learned that, yes, many of them DID wear combat boots, although it was more common in rural areas.
5. I’m not sure what country Final Solution is from, but in case they’re from a country with a large Irish population, this contains a lot of left-wing and some anti-fascist stuff. For why that’s important, see this. (UPDATE 2/8/20 I just did some research. They're American but their frontman was with the Hammerskins, a network of Nazi skinhead crews that at one point included one in the unionist community of N. Ireland (I can't find an answer, but the band may have been officially connected to the Hammerskins))
6. Considering the original, I should say that Irish pride is very different from white pride (most of the time). (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
**7. 44% of this version is me, 56% is the original.
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
10. UPDATE 4/22/11 I said something about the 32-County Republic which sounds like I believe it exists. I believe in the vision of that Republic, but I don't believe it exists.
11. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
you say we’re terrorists, you say we’re fash
your bullshit lies will not last
we’re proud republican socialists deep from our heart
to free our nation we shall do our part
united we stand, divided we fall
stand up all you Irish and answer our call
because revolution is near and the battle is at hand
we must revolt now to free our land
Chorus:
wake up all you Irish and sign up quick
vow your allegiance to the 32-County Republic
load up your rifles and lace your boots
the british presence we will uproot
we’re not just reacting, we’re creating revolution
Irish unity and socialism are the only solution
we’re republicans, fighting for our land
we’ll push out the squaddies with rifle in hand
we want freedom, we’ll feel the glory
we’ll fight to the death for Irish victory
****
“This Island Is Ours” based on “This Planet Is Ours” by Centurion, original lyrics are here.
1. Squaddies is a term for British soldier.
2. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
3. “Tiocfaidh ar la” is a republican slogan which means “our day will come.”
4. This is set in the early 1970s and is about the Provisonal republican movement.
5. The RUC were the police until late 2001.
**6. 29% of this version is me, 71% is the original.
7. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
8. I’m not sure what country Centurion is from, but in case they’re from a country with a large Irish population, this contains some anti-right stuff. For why that’s important, see this.
9. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
We’ll drive the Squaddies out of our land
We’ll crush the Orange back into the sands
We’ll break the hold of the imperialist power
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
We’ll stand against the Tory lies
Not stand and watch as our childen die
We’ll take it back in this perilous hour
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
Chorus:
This island is ours! We have the right!
This island is ours! We have the might!
This island is ours! we’ll take on the RUC
This island is ours! Until all Ireland is free
We’ll watch our numbers grow in might
As we inspire our enemies fright
We’ll show no mercy as squaddies cower
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
And in the stars shall we proclaim
Our heroic deeds of glorious fame
And see our people be empowered
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 80% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
One of them is about anti-racist skinheads, see the introduction of the first post with such songs for some information about them.
These are all about the same quality.
1. Lace Up Your Boots. Anti-Racist Skinheads.
2. Solidarity. The global working-class.
3. The Only Solution. The IRA in N. Ireland.
4. This Island is Ours. Same.
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
“Lace Up Your Boots” based on “Allegiance” by Final Solution (original lyrics are here)
1. This is a song about anti-racist skinheads.
2. The first two lines are about how some large chunk of anti-racists, probably about half of those who know that there ARE anti-racist skinheads, are very critical of anti-racist skinheads.
3. anti-racist skinheads tend to be working-class.
4. It’s partly meant as an appeal to traditional (non-political) skinheads to become anti-racist. (no, I don't expect them to give a shit what I think of them, but I feel comfortable saying they should be anti-racist)
5. Black laces on their boots indicates that skinheads are traditional, blue indicates that they’re anti-racist.
6. The roots of the skinhead culture are with Jamaicans in the UK. The original skinheads were neither fascist nor white supremacist.
**7. 39% of this version is me, 61% is the original (this figure reflects the changes made in the 1st two lines).
8. I give this song/poem three stars out five.
9. UPDATE 2/21/11 I have just changed most of the 1st line (1st verse) and all of the 2nd line (1st verse)
You say we´re too violent, you say we don't assist
In taking down the white supremacists
We're proud anti-racist workers, deep from our heart.
To unite our class, we shall do our part.
United we stand, divided we'll fall.
Stand up all you skinheads and answer our call
Because change is near and the battle is at hand.
We must fight now to save our land.
Chorus:
Wake up all you skins and show your faces!
trade in the black for blue laces!
Shave your heads and lace up your boots,
with this anti-fascist fight we must remember our roots!
We're not a trend, we're here to stay
We're anti-racist Skinheads and fuck the KKK
We're the workers fighting for our class.
We'll finish our foes with a boot in their ass.
We want workers power, we'll feel the glory.
We'll fight till the death for our victory!
Chorus
***
“Solidarity II” based on “this planet is ours” by Centurion, original lyrics are here.
1. It’s about the working-class.
2. the references to fighting are meant to be something like 90% non-violent.
**3. 25% of this version is me, 75% is the original.
4. I give this song three stars out of five.
5. I skipped the last verse.
We’ll drive out the capitalist crud
We’ll crush the fash back into the mud
We’ll break the hold of the corporate powers
Soldiarity! This planet is ours!
We’ll stand against the right-wing lies
Not stand and watch as our children die
We’ll take it back in this perilous hour
Solidarity! This planet is ours!
Chorus:
This planet’s ours! We have the right!
This planet’s ours! We have the might!
This planet’s ours! We’ll ever fight!
This planet’s ours! Until the world’s without the Right
We’ll watch our power grow in might
As we inspire our enemy’s fright
We’ll show no mercy as our foe cowers
Solidarity! This planet is ours!
****
“The Only Solution” based on “Allegiance” by Final Solution original lyrics (original lyrics are here)
1. It’s about Irish republican socialists Volunteers.
2. Many critics of the IRA (which (during the 1980s, when this song is set) was mostly made up of socialists) call them fascist. This is debunked in the post “The Brown And The Green.”
3. There are 32 Counties in Ireland.
4. This is another where I suggest that IRA members wore combat boots, in this case it’s because “boots” is in the original. They might have worn them, some of the time. UPDATE 10/5/10 I just learned that, yes, many of them DID wear combat boots, although it was more common in rural areas.
5. I’m not sure what country Final Solution is from, but in case they’re from a country with a large Irish population, this contains a lot of left-wing and some anti-fascist stuff. For why that’s important, see this. (UPDATE 2/8/20 I just did some research. They're American but their frontman was with the Hammerskins, a network of Nazi skinhead crews that at one point included one in the unionist community of N. Ireland (I can't find an answer, but the band may have been officially connected to the Hammerskins))
6. Considering the original, I should say that Irish pride is very different from white pride (most of the time). (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
**7. 44% of this version is me, 56% is the original.
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
10. UPDATE 4/22/11 I said something about the 32-County Republic which sounds like I believe it exists. I believe in the vision of that Republic, but I don't believe it exists.
11. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
you say we’re terrorists, you say we’re fash
your bullshit lies will not last
we’re proud republican socialists deep from our heart
to free our nation we shall do our part
united we stand, divided we fall
stand up all you Irish and answer our call
because revolution is near and the battle is at hand
we must revolt now to free our land
Chorus:
wake up all you Irish and sign up quick
vow your allegiance to the 32-County Republic
load up your rifles and lace your boots
the british presence we will uproot
we’re not just reacting, we’re creating revolution
Irish unity and socialism are the only solution
we’re republicans, fighting for our land
we’ll push out the squaddies with rifle in hand
we want freedom, we’ll feel the glory
we’ll fight to the death for Irish victory
****
“This Island Is Ours” based on “This Planet Is Ours” by Centurion, original lyrics are here.
1. Squaddies is a term for British soldier.
2. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
3. “Tiocfaidh ar la” is a republican slogan which means “our day will come.”
4. This is set in the early 1970s and is about the Provisonal republican movement.
5. The RUC were the police until late 2001.
**6. 29% of this version is me, 71% is the original.
7. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
8. I’m not sure what country Centurion is from, but in case they’re from a country with a large Irish population, this contains some anti-right stuff. For why that’s important, see this.
9. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
We’ll drive the Squaddies out of our land
We’ll crush the Orange back into the sands
We’ll break the hold of the imperialist power
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
We’ll stand against the Tory lies
Not stand and watch as our childen die
We’ll take it back in this perilous hour
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
Chorus:
This island is ours! We have the right!
This island is ours! We have the might!
This island is ours! we’ll take on the RUC
This island is ours! Until all Ireland is free
We’ll watch our numbers grow in might
As we inspire our enemies fright
We’ll show no mercy as squaddies cower
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
And in the stars shall we proclaim
Our heroic deeds of glorious fame
And see our people be empowered
Tiocfaidh ar la! This island is ours!
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 80% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews W
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Assignment” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but one of my favorites. I give it four stars out of five.
“Trials and Tribble-ations” See this for a plot summary.
Although only about 13 years old, this might be considered a classic ST episode. It not only involves time travel, it uses footage from an episode that was part of The Original Series, and has DS9 characters appearing to interact with characters from TOS.
I give it five stars out of five.
“Let He Who Is Without Sin...” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is kind of about the culture wars, although it seems that the conservative side is not motivated by religion. Instead they’re concerned that the pampered, safe, and sometimes hedonistic lifestyle of Federation citizens has made them weak in the face of external threats. Worf does see it as a moral problem. Even though it doesn’t refer to religion, it still kind of makes a good statement about the culture wars from the liberal side.
I give it three stars out of five.
”Things Past” See this for a plot summary.
Although it was well-established much earlier (in the ST universe) that the Cardassian occupation of Bajor was brutal and very unjust, this episode illustrates that more.
We also learn that Garak is sort of racist towards Bajorans, as he says (while cleaning Quark’s bar) that “the Bajorans were much more suited for this sort of thing than we were- servile work is in their nature.”
Gul Dukat’s racism towards the Bajorans is illustrated when he says that the Bajorans are like his children.
It’s also an episode that contributes to how inspirational the story of the Bajoran resistance is.
Overall a good episode, I give it four stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Assignment” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but one of my favorites. I give it four stars out of five.
“Trials and Tribble-ations” See this for a plot summary.
Although only about 13 years old, this might be considered a classic ST episode. It not only involves time travel, it uses footage from an episode that was part of The Original Series, and has DS9 characters appearing to interact with characters from TOS.
I give it five stars out of five.
“Let He Who Is Without Sin...” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is kind of about the culture wars, although it seems that the conservative side is not motivated by religion. Instead they’re concerned that the pampered, safe, and sometimes hedonistic lifestyle of Federation citizens has made them weak in the face of external threats. Worf does see it as a moral problem. Even though it doesn’t refer to religion, it still kind of makes a good statement about the culture wars from the liberal side.
I give it three stars out of five.
”Things Past” See this for a plot summary.
Although it was well-established much earlier (in the ST universe) that the Cardassian occupation of Bajor was brutal and very unjust, this episode illustrates that more.
We also learn that Garak is sort of racist towards Bajorans, as he says (while cleaning Quark’s bar) that “the Bajorans were much more suited for this sort of thing than we were- servile work is in their nature.”
Gul Dukat’s racism towards the Bajorans is illustrated when he says that the Bajorans are like his children.
It’s also an episode that contributes to how inspirational the story of the Bajoran resistance is.
Overall a good episode, I give it four stars out of five.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews V
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Body Parts” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but we learn something new about Ferengi capitalism. It has a racist aspect, as contracts with another Ferengi are sacred but contracts with aliens can be broken for any reason. I found that kind of surprising.
Overall, a good episode, I give it two stars out of five.
“Broken Link” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Apocalypse Rising” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it four stars out five.
“The Ship” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I especially like the end when Sisko and Dax talk about the minor-very minor Starfleet characters who were killed.
I give it four stars out of five.
“Looking for par'Mach in All the Wrong Places” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode. I give it two stars out of five.
“...Nor the Battle to the Strong” See this for a plot summary.
A very political episode about how horrible war is. Although I believe that sometimes, in this fucked up world, it’s necessary, helpful, and/or justified, to fight, but war is still horrible and this episode does a good job of illustrating that. The more people understand how horrible war is, the more people will see it as an option of last resort.
I give it three stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Body Parts” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but we learn something new about Ferengi capitalism. It has a racist aspect, as contracts with another Ferengi are sacred but contracts with aliens can be broken for any reason. I found that kind of surprising.
Overall, a good episode, I give it two stars out of five.
“Broken Link” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I give it three stars out of five.
“Apocalypse Rising” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one, I give it four stars out five.
“The Ship” See this for a plot summary.
A non-political episode, but a good one. I especially like the end when Sisko and Dax talk about the minor-very minor Starfleet characters who were killed.
I give it four stars out of five.
“Looking for par'Mach in All the Wrong Places” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode. I give it two stars out of five.
“...Nor the Battle to the Strong” See this for a plot summary.
A very political episode about how horrible war is. Although I believe that sometimes, in this fucked up world, it’s necessary, helpful, and/or justified, to fight, but war is still horrible and this episode does a good job of illustrating that. The more people understand how horrible war is, the more people will see it as an option of last resort.
I give it three stars out of five.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews U
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Muse” See this for a plot summary.
Overall a fairly non-political episode, but there’s one thing briefly touched on that I’d like to mention. The idea of strictly segregating boys and girls is disgusting (the alien race in question only tells boys and girls about the other sex when they’re 16). Although I get the impression little progress has been made, this is a small part of why I sort of initially supported the invasion of Afghanistan and today have only largely not totally moved from thinking it was a good idea (I lean towards saying we should get out at this point, I'm just not real enthusiastic about it because of the likelihood the Taliban will get back into power, but it's still the right for us to do) (my feelings about this are partly based on the minority statement of the Young Democratic Socialists, here (the page is no longer there)). Anyway, the Taliban treated women horribly and a large degree of segregation was part of it.
I give it two stars out of five.
“For the cause” See this for a plot summary
A fairly non-political episode, except for the politics of the Maquis. I’ve described my thoughts about them here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.”
Eddington talks about how the Federation wants Cardassia to join. That suggests that he thinks no amount of democracy and reform will change Cardassia, although his attitude might make some sense if Cardassia is continuing to attack ex-Federation colonists, but he is still probably under-estimating the ability of Cardassia to change. He also fails to see that if Cardassia did join the Federation, the Federation would be able to stop Cardassian mis-treatment of the colonists.
Eddington also accuses the Federation of being hostile to the Maquis because they left the Federation. I’ve got mixed feelings about the Federation attitude towards the Maquis but I don’t think that’s why there’s hostility.
I give it three stars out of five.
“To The Death” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a very good one. The idea of Starfleet and the Jem’Hadar working together is a great story. And O’Brien’s statement before they go into battle is great. I give it four stars out of five.
“The Quickening” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a good one, I give it three stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“The Muse” See this for a plot summary.
Overall a fairly non-political episode, but there’s one thing briefly touched on that I’d like to mention. The idea of strictly segregating boys and girls is disgusting (the alien race in question only tells boys and girls about the other sex when they’re 16). Although I get the impression little progress has been made, this is a small part of why I sort of initially supported the invasion of Afghanistan and today have only largely not totally moved from thinking it was a good idea (I lean towards saying we should get out at this point, I'm just not real enthusiastic about it because of the likelihood the Taliban will get back into power, but it's still the right for us to do) (my feelings about this are partly based on the minority statement of the Young Democratic Socialists, here (the page is no longer there)). Anyway, the Taliban treated women horribly and a large degree of segregation was part of it.
I give it two stars out of five.
“For the cause” See this for a plot summary
A fairly non-political episode, except for the politics of the Maquis. I’ve described my thoughts about them here, while discussing the two-parter “The Maquis.”
Eddington talks about how the Federation wants Cardassia to join. That suggests that he thinks no amount of democracy and reform will change Cardassia, although his attitude might make some sense if Cardassia is continuing to attack ex-Federation colonists, but he is still probably under-estimating the ability of Cardassia to change. He also fails to see that if Cardassia did join the Federation, the Federation would be able to stop Cardassian mis-treatment of the colonists.
Eddington also accuses the Federation of being hostile to the Maquis because they left the Federation. I’ve got mixed feelings about the Federation attitude towards the Maquis but I don’t think that’s why there’s hostility.
I give it three stars out of five.
“To The Death” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a very good one. The idea of Starfleet and the Jem’Hadar working together is a great story. And O’Brien’s statement before they go into battle is great. I give it four stars out of five.
“The Quickening” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode, but a good one, I give it three stars out of five.
Fetch that Armalite (Lyrics)
Four more songs. They're all "Those Lyrics," see this for an explanation.
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
I start with the ones that are okay and end with the ones that are good.
“Declaration Of War” based on “Let the Battle Begin” by Celtic Warrior. I can’t find the original lyrics on the internet, but I found a karoke-style Youtube video with the lyrics, here or you can email me and I’ll send them to you.
1. Since Celtic Warrior is Welsh and possibly sympathetic to republicanism or Irish nationalism, I included some elements that are hostile to fascism.
2. The AK-47 is a rifle, the RPG is the Rocket Propelled Grenade.
3. This is set at the beggining of the Troubles, in the early 1970s.
4. The plough is the Starry Plough, the flag of republican socialism.
5. The line about changing the world is a reference to the internationalism of republicans, for example in supporting the Palestinians.
**6. 16% of this version is me, 84% is the original.
7. I give this song three stars out of five.
8. Valhalla is part of Norse mythology, it's a place where warriors go after they die, although there seems to be some debate about exactly who gets in- only people who die in combat? Anyway, the fascists love it and have sort of taken over the concept, but a friend told me that he likes the idea of the left claiming it and specifically said that if such a place exists, Che and others like him are probably there. (Do I believe in Valhalla? You could say I’m sort of an agnostic on that question and am sort of solidly a Christian. The way I see it, this is pretty flexible, don't take it too seriously, and one way to think about it is that if you believe in Heaven and would rather these people went there instead of Valhalla, maybe they can do both, spend some time in Valhalla and some time in Heaven; but my friend and I do like the idea of reclaiming it from the fash)
9. Considering the original, I should say that Irish pride is very different from white pride (most of the time). (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
10. This is overwhelmingly about the IRA, although it would make sense to say that the second half of the last line is more about their fellow republicans in SF.
UPDATE 1/28/11 11. When I say they're anti-fascist soldiers, I am not saying that their enemy is fascist, although a minority of them are. Even though they are not battling fascism, they are both soldiers and anti-fascist, so it makes sense.
UPDATE 3/18/15 12. I added "and mothers."
13. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Chorus:
let the battle begin, there’s no time to spare
let the battle begin, war has been declared
in the distance i see the smoke the flames and darkened sky
as we march forward to victory can you hear the battle cry
with AK and RPG we lead the fight our fathers and mothers did before
we’re anti-fascist soldiers, proud to be Irish, we’re fighting a liberation war
Chorus
thunder roars, lightening strikes the bells in hell start to chime
we’ll slay the beast, even the score yeah drive them out this time
blood is spilt, victory is ours, we will never face defeat
but if i die fighting for my people, in valhalla save my seat
Chorus
united we’re strong, united we stand, standing for our nation’s sake
Irish men and women together as one, calling out for Ireland to awake
our destiny awaits, the white flame burns, we march on with the plough unfurled
we take back what’s our’s, reclaim our land and we’re gonna help change the world
Chorus
****
“We are the threat that is red” based on “Red Threat” by Ian Stuart and Stigger, original lyrics are here.
1. Ian Stuart was the leader of Skrewdriver and was a big supporter of the British and Unionist causes in N. Ireland.
2. This takes place in the mid-1990s. At that point N. Ireland was slightly less orange than it had been about 5 years earlier (the UDA, a loyalist paramilitary, was first banned from the airwaves and then banned completely) and much less orange than it had been 30 years earlier, and the re-dawning would mean going backwards to some degree.
3. The RUC were the police in N. Ireland until late 2001.
4. Although my experience reading the BBC web-site and comparing what’s there with what’s reported in Irish/Irish-nationalist/Irish-republican news sources makes me think that the BBC, at least since the late 1990s, has been okay (not good) covering the North there’s still a lot of room for improvement and republicans have often criticized the BBC.
5. When this takes place, probably some small majority of republicans would have called themselves marxists (I'm not sure what I would say about Marxists in the ANC in the mid-1990s, it was probably something similar (this is not the best line I've done, but at the time it seemed like it was the best option I could think of at the time). UPDATE 1/28/11 I just deleted the word Marxist. It says instead, "fighting for freedom."
6. Republicans are generally in favor of religious and racial “mixing” and believe that it is good for society.
7. Bread is a symbol of economic justice.
8. The Dail is the Irish parliament and it has pretty much never shown as much concern about partition as it should.
9. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
10. Considering the source of the original, I feel like I have to point out what is probably obvious: as long as it doesn't cross a certain line (and I imagine it rarely does) Irish pride is very different from White pride. (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
**11. 31% of this version is me, 69% is the original.
12. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
13. This is about the IRA although the BBC part could apply to unarmed republicans and to nationalists.
This is a warning, against an Orange day re-dawning
With the RUC trying to bash you in your head
Take on the BBC, we’re fighting for freedom like the ANC
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
We encourage people mixing, to us it is so fixing
We fight for freedom, for democracy and for bread
Just for one occasion, let the Dail think of our divided nation
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
We'll fight in the cities, we'll fight in the country
And we'll fight, the Orange peril, our pride we'll not shed
For the strength of the Irish nation, will be our salvation
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
****
“Fetch That Armalite” based on “Fetch The Rope” by The Klansmen original lyrics are here.
1. The Klansmen was a side project of Ian Stuart Donaldson of Skrewdriver. Ian Stuart was a big supporter of the British and unionist causes in N. Ireland, so this is twisting the original.
2. Volunteers are members of republican paramilitaries.
3. Although James Connolly (Ireland’s greatest socialist and greatest republican) was killed about 6 years before Ireland was divided, he predicted that the result of partition would be a ”carnival of reaction” which has basically happened, especially in the North.
4. A good description of what kind of state the Catholics were in is here. A longer and better source is the book “Northern Ireland: The Orange State” by Michael Farrell.
5. Armalites are rifles often used by the IRA.
6. Squaddies are British soldiers.
7. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
8. Also, the first line is a reference to how the IRA never or almost never retaliated against civilian people.
9. The line about justice and peace dying is a reference to the early 1970s when Bloody Sunday saw the civil rights movement shot off the streets by the British Army.
**10. 80% of this version is me, 20% is the original (80% is a new record, one I probably won’t break)
11. I give this song three stars out of five.
12. This song is NOT meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
13. This is about the IRA.
14. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Them good old Volunteers they held their fire despite the rising hate
Black masks, automatic rifles, they took on the British state
When the nation was cut in two, Connolly had predicted what did ensue
The Catholics were left in a one party state, no democracy, lots of hate
don't give up the fight
your cause is so right
don't give up the fight
Fetch that armalite
Squaddies from across the sea said they were there to keep the peace
But they turned out just as bad as the sectarian police
When justice and peace really died, the volunteers didn't hesitate
They were determined to smash the orange six-county state
*****
“Eamonn Joined The IRA” based on “Johnny Joined The Klan” by The Klansmen original lyrics are here.
1. The Klansmen was a side project of Ian Stuart Donaldson of Skrewdriver. Ian Stuart was a big supporter of the British and unionist causes in N. Ireland, so this is twisting the original.
2. Derry is the second largest city in N. Ireland. The West Bank is a new way of referring to what used to be called “cityside.” The area is on the west bank of the River Foyle, and using that term is an expression of solidarity with the Palestinians. The West Bank is almost 100% Nationalist. and had some large nationalist majority during the conflict when this song is set.
3. Eamonn Wright is a made up name for IRA snipers- “Aiming Right.” (I'm not sure who first thought that up, as far as I can tell two song-writers have used it, and that's where I got it from)
4. That’s a reference to sectarian murder of Catholics.
5. I’ve heard that, unsurprisingly, there was a problem with British soldiers harrassing Nationalist women sexually (there was already a reference to going after men who "victimized" “girls” in the original (I put victimized in quotes because Ian Stuart is talking about Black men who he just assumes have done something wrong))
6. Belfast is the largest city in N. Ireland.
7. The hope is that at some point there will be a serious decrease in how widespread sectarianism is among Protestants. Also, that they’ll understand that they have nothing to fear from a United Ireland.
**8. 76% of this version is me, 24% is the original.
9. I give this version three stars out of five.
10. This is about the IRA, although, I think almost by definition, all nationalists rejected the Crown.
11. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Way up North in Derry town
in the West Bank where they reject the Crown
There was a neighborhood where the republican flame burned bright
Where lived an Irish boy named Eamonn Wright
Didn't like Brits patrolling night and day
So, Eamonn went and joined the IRA
Chorus
Go, go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Well Eamonn joined the IRA
He would hide his rifle in the front garden
with every sectarian murder his committment would harden
Aiming for the Brits who harrassed the girls
Eamonn fired his rifle with Irish Flag unfurled
A dozen died at Eamonn’s hand
Eamonn took them out to free his land
Chorus
His mother told him one day we will be free
just like South Africa liberated by the ANC
he was known all over, from Cork to Belfast town
He was feared by those who fought for the Crown
One day the Brits will leave Ireland
And the Protestants will all understand
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 80% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
I start with the ones that are okay and end with the ones that are good.
“Declaration Of War” based on “Let the Battle Begin” by Celtic Warrior. I can’t find the original lyrics on the internet, but I found a karoke-style Youtube video with the lyrics, here or you can email me and I’ll send them to you.
1. Since Celtic Warrior is Welsh and possibly sympathetic to republicanism or Irish nationalism, I included some elements that are hostile to fascism.
2. The AK-47 is a rifle, the RPG is the Rocket Propelled Grenade.
3. This is set at the beggining of the Troubles, in the early 1970s.
4. The plough is the Starry Plough, the flag of republican socialism.
5. The line about changing the world is a reference to the internationalism of republicans, for example in supporting the Palestinians.
**6. 16% of this version is me, 84% is the original.
7. I give this song three stars out of five.
8. Valhalla is part of Norse mythology, it's a place where warriors go after they die, although there seems to be some debate about exactly who gets in- only people who die in combat? Anyway, the fascists love it and have sort of taken over the concept, but a friend told me that he likes the idea of the left claiming it and specifically said that if such a place exists, Che and others like him are probably there. (Do I believe in Valhalla? You could say I’m sort of an agnostic on that question and am sort of solidly a Christian. The way I see it, this is pretty flexible, don't take it too seriously, and one way to think about it is that if you believe in Heaven and would rather these people went there instead of Valhalla, maybe they can do both, spend some time in Valhalla and some time in Heaven; but my friend and I do like the idea of reclaiming it from the fash)
9. Considering the original, I should say that Irish pride is very different from white pride (most of the time). (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
10. This is overwhelmingly about the IRA, although it would make sense to say that the second half of the last line is more about their fellow republicans in SF.
UPDATE 1/28/11 11. When I say they're anti-fascist soldiers, I am not saying that their enemy is fascist, although a minority of them are. Even though they are not battling fascism, they are both soldiers and anti-fascist, so it makes sense.
UPDATE 3/18/15 12. I added "and mothers."
13. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Chorus:
let the battle begin, there’s no time to spare
let the battle begin, war has been declared
in the distance i see the smoke the flames and darkened sky
as we march forward to victory can you hear the battle cry
with AK and RPG we lead the fight our fathers and mothers did before
we’re anti-fascist soldiers, proud to be Irish, we’re fighting a liberation war
Chorus
thunder roars, lightening strikes the bells in hell start to chime
we’ll slay the beast, even the score yeah drive them out this time
blood is spilt, victory is ours, we will never face defeat
but if i die fighting for my people, in valhalla save my seat
Chorus
united we’re strong, united we stand, standing for our nation’s sake
Irish men and women together as one, calling out for Ireland to awake
our destiny awaits, the white flame burns, we march on with the plough unfurled
we take back what’s our’s, reclaim our land and we’re gonna help change the world
Chorus
****
“We are the threat that is red” based on “Red Threat” by Ian Stuart and Stigger, original lyrics are here.
1. Ian Stuart was the leader of Skrewdriver and was a big supporter of the British and Unionist causes in N. Ireland.
2. This takes place in the mid-1990s. At that point N. Ireland was slightly less orange than it had been about 5 years earlier (the UDA, a loyalist paramilitary, was first banned from the airwaves and then banned completely) and much less orange than it had been 30 years earlier, and the re-dawning would mean going backwards to some degree.
3. The RUC were the police in N. Ireland until late 2001.
4. Although my experience reading the BBC web-site and comparing what’s there with what’s reported in Irish/Irish-nationalist/Irish-republican news sources makes me think that the BBC, at least since the late 1990s, has been okay (not good) covering the North there’s still a lot of room for improvement and republicans have often criticized the BBC.
5. When this takes place, probably some small majority of republicans would have called themselves marxists (I'm not sure what I would say about Marxists in the ANC in the mid-1990s, it was probably something similar (this is not the best line I've done, but at the time it seemed like it was the best option I could think of at the time). UPDATE 1/28/11 I just deleted the word Marxist. It says instead, "fighting for freedom."
6. Republicans are generally in favor of religious and racial “mixing” and believe that it is good for society.
7. Bread is a symbol of economic justice.
8. The Dail is the Irish parliament and it has pretty much never shown as much concern about partition as it should.
9. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
10. Considering the source of the original, I feel like I have to point out what is probably obvious: as long as it doesn't cross a certain line (and I imagine it rarely does) Irish pride is very different from White pride. (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
**11. 31% of this version is me, 69% is the original.
12. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
13. This is about the IRA although the BBC part could apply to unarmed republicans and to nationalists.
This is a warning, against an Orange day re-dawning
With the RUC trying to bash you in your head
Take on the BBC, we’re fighting for freedom like the ANC
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
We encourage people mixing, to us it is so fixing
We fight for freedom, for democracy and for bread
Just for one occasion, let the Dail think of our divided nation
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
We'll fight in the cities, we'll fight in the country
And we'll fight, the Orange peril, our pride we'll not shed
For the strength of the Irish nation, will be our salvation
Come on all you Irish, we are the threat that is Red
****
“Fetch That Armalite” based on “Fetch The Rope” by The Klansmen original lyrics are here.
1. The Klansmen was a side project of Ian Stuart Donaldson of Skrewdriver. Ian Stuart was a big supporter of the British and unionist causes in N. Ireland, so this is twisting the original.
2. Volunteers are members of republican paramilitaries.
3. Although James Connolly (Ireland’s greatest socialist and greatest republican) was killed about 6 years before Ireland was divided, he predicted that the result of partition would be a ”carnival of reaction” which has basically happened, especially in the North.
4. A good description of what kind of state the Catholics were in is here. A longer and better source is the book “Northern Ireland: The Orange State” by Michael Farrell.
5. Armalites are rifles often used by the IRA.
6. Squaddies are British soldiers.
7. Orange is the color of anti-Catholic bigotry in the Irish-British context.
8. Also, the first line is a reference to how the IRA never or almost never retaliated against civilian people.
9. The line about justice and peace dying is a reference to the early 1970s when Bloody Sunday saw the civil rights movement shot off the streets by the British Army.
**10. 80% of this version is me, 20% is the original (80% is a new record, one I probably won’t break)
11. I give this song three stars out of five.
12. This song is NOT meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
13. This is about the IRA.
14. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Them good old Volunteers they held their fire despite the rising hate
Black masks, automatic rifles, they took on the British state
When the nation was cut in two, Connolly had predicted what did ensue
The Catholics were left in a one party state, no democracy, lots of hate
don't give up the fight
your cause is so right
don't give up the fight
Fetch that armalite
Squaddies from across the sea said they were there to keep the peace
But they turned out just as bad as the sectarian police
When justice and peace really died, the volunteers didn't hesitate
They were determined to smash the orange six-county state
*****
“Eamonn Joined The IRA” based on “Johnny Joined The Klan” by The Klansmen original lyrics are here.
1. The Klansmen was a side project of Ian Stuart Donaldson of Skrewdriver. Ian Stuart was a big supporter of the British and unionist causes in N. Ireland, so this is twisting the original.
2. Derry is the second largest city in N. Ireland. The West Bank is a new way of referring to what used to be called “cityside.” The area is on the west bank of the River Foyle, and using that term is an expression of solidarity with the Palestinians. The West Bank is almost 100% Nationalist. and had some large nationalist majority during the conflict when this song is set.
3. Eamonn Wright is a made up name for IRA snipers- “Aiming Right.” (I'm not sure who first thought that up, as far as I can tell two song-writers have used it, and that's where I got it from)
4. That’s a reference to sectarian murder of Catholics.
5. I’ve heard that, unsurprisingly, there was a problem with British soldiers harrassing Nationalist women sexually (there was already a reference to going after men who "victimized" “girls” in the original (I put victimized in quotes because Ian Stuart is talking about Black men who he just assumes have done something wrong))
6. Belfast is the largest city in N. Ireland.
7. The hope is that at some point there will be a serious decrease in how widespread sectarianism is among Protestants. Also, that they’ll understand that they have nothing to fear from a United Ireland.
**8. 76% of this version is me, 24% is the original.
9. I give this version three stars out of five.
10. This is about the IRA, although, I think almost by definition, all nationalists rejected the Crown.
11. UPDATED 2/5/16 Based on what might be called a fairly scientific look, only about .2% of the IRA's operations intentionally resulted in civilian death.
Way up North in Derry town
in the West Bank where they reject the Crown
There was a neighborhood where the republican flame burned bright
Where lived an Irish boy named Eamonn Wright
Didn't like Brits patrolling night and day
So, Eamonn went and joined the IRA
Chorus
Go, go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Go Eamonn go go
Well Eamonn joined the IRA
He would hide his rifle in the front garden
with every sectarian murder his committment would harden
Aiming for the Brits who harrassed the girls
Eamonn fired his rifle with Irish Flag unfurled
A dozen died at Eamonn’s hand
Eamonn took them out to free his land
Chorus
His mother told him one day we will be free
just like South Africa liberated by the ANC
he was known all over, from Cork to Belfast town
He was feared by those who fought for the Crown
One day the Brits will leave Ireland
And the Protestants will all understand
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 80% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
Friday, August 7, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews T
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Acession” See this for a plot summary.
This episode raises the issue of caste systems and caste discrimination. I don’t think there’s much debate about this so I’ll just say that people should not be discriminated against in that manner and people’s work should not be mandated based on who their parents were.
I give this episode two stars out of five.
“Rules of Engagement” See this for a plot summary.
A fairly non-political episode. One thing I’d say is that Worf is lucky the ship he fired at was full of dead people. As he admitted, he should have identified it before firing.
It’s a good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Hard Time” See this for a plot summary.
For the most part a non-political episode, although it does sort of have something to say about punishment for crimes. The method described in the episode seems very questionable. The upside would be that you don’t lose a lot of your life, but it also means that people who turn out to be innocent can’t be released before their sentence is completed- the memories are there forever. There’s also something wrong with messing with someone’s head like that. There’s also the part where it’s all punishment and no rehabilitation- no counseling, no training, none of that. So, overall I would say it’s a bad way of dealing with crime.
A good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Shattered Mirror” See this for a plot summary.
A fairly non-political episode, although there is one brief statement against torture. Here’s why torture should not used:
1) It’s simply immoral- I think almost everyone would agree, even some of those who say that it’s effective and should be used in some cases.
2) It’s likely to get bad information. People will say whatever they think will end the torture.
3) When news of it gets out to the public it will affect global opinion negatively and will negatively affect morale among most of the American population and much of the American military.
I’m not a huge fan of the mirror universe episodes, so I give this one two stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Acession” See this for a plot summary.
This episode raises the issue of caste systems and caste discrimination. I don’t think there’s much debate about this so I’ll just say that people should not be discriminated against in that manner and people’s work should not be mandated based on who their parents were.
I give this episode two stars out of five.
“Rules of Engagement” See this for a plot summary.
A fairly non-political episode. One thing I’d say is that Worf is lucky the ship he fired at was full of dead people. As he admitted, he should have identified it before firing.
It’s a good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Hard Time” See this for a plot summary.
For the most part a non-political episode, although it does sort of have something to say about punishment for crimes. The method described in the episode seems very questionable. The upside would be that you don’t lose a lot of your life, but it also means that people who turn out to be innocent can’t be released before their sentence is completed- the memories are there forever. There’s also something wrong with messing with someone’s head like that. There’s also the part where it’s all punishment and no rehabilitation- no counseling, no training, none of that. So, overall I would say it’s a bad way of dealing with crime.
A good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Shattered Mirror” See this for a plot summary.
A fairly non-political episode, although there is one brief statement against torture. Here’s why torture should not used:
1) It’s simply immoral- I think almost everyone would agree, even some of those who say that it’s effective and should be used in some cases.
2) It’s likely to get bad information. People will say whatever they think will end the torture.
3) When news of it gets out to the public it will affect global opinion negatively and will negatively affect morale among most of the American population and much of the American military.
I’m not a huge fan of the mirror universe episodes, so I give this one two stars out of five.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Reviews S
This is one of my posts where I “review” Star Trek episodes. I will be giving each one a star rating. I sometimes will make some comments about non-political parts of them that I like or don’t like. I’ll sometimes use the issues raised in the episode to discuss similar issues in real life. And I will sometimes simply high-light the progressive politics of ST. ST is in-line with the three original themes of this blog, as I explain in the first ST post where I offer some general thoughts about ST.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Crossfire” See this for a plot summary.
In general a non-political episode, but there’s some tiny elements of politics.
First, there’s one reference to domestic violence, but the good statement is eroded by the idea that a good sex life is a legitimate reason for someone to stay in an abusive relationship. It might seem less offensive to many considering that the victim is male and the attacker is female, but that doesn’t make it okay.
The issue of Bajor applying to join the Federation and some resistance among Bajorans to that is raised. I think I’ve briefly discussed this before. I believe that the Federation is a good thing and should be expanded and would be helpful for Bajor as they get back on their feet after the Cardassian occupation.
I give it two stars out of five.
“Return to Grace” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode. There’s some discussion of bigotry- about how a half-Cardassian, half-Bajoran woman is unwelcome in both societies.
Overall a good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Sons of Mogh” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is largely non-political but includes one reference to the limits of multi-culturalism. Although there might be some exceptions on either side of this, customs which violate a nation’s laws should not be tolerated- there might be some customs which violate laws and should be respected anyway (the laws should be modified), and some customs which should be banned with new laws. One good example I can think of is female circumcision. I haven’t read about it in a long time, but I believe that it is wrong and should be banned.
I give it two stars out of five.
“Bar Association” See this for a plot summary.
A very political episode and one of the most progressive ST episodes made. It’s explicitly pro-union. There’s also reason to believe that the Federation and Starfleet are pro-union, as Sisko orders Odo to not interfere with the strikers and pressures Quark to negotiate with them. We also learn more about how raw Ferengi capitalism is.
The Ferengi Commerce Authority, which arrives to help Quark break the strike, is apparently able and willing to go very far. They threaten the strikers with fines against their relatives and the seizing of their financial accounts and also with death. They also openly use physical intimidation of the strikers with notorious Nausicaans and beat up someone the strike leader cares about and seem on the verge of killing the strike leader when the strike is resolved.
On the other hand, the Ferengi staff indicate that they still have a lot of respect for capitalism, talking about how they want to BECOME the exploiters and how they want to increase their profits (it wasn’t a reference to profit sharing). But that’s because they’re Ferengi.
Overall it’s very pro-labor. As usual whatever is considered “normal” for Ferengis is portrayed negatively and as in conflict with the Federation. The strikers seem to get a lot of popular support from the station’s population.
I give it four stars out of five.
I’m not very familiar with The Original Series and there might be some small amount of material there that would affect what I say about Star Trek (i.e. how often religion is mentioned)
Lastly. multi-culturalism is such a pervasive theme in ST that I only comment on it when it goes beyond the norm (i.e. inter-species partners).
“Crossfire” See this for a plot summary.
In general a non-political episode, but there’s some tiny elements of politics.
First, there’s one reference to domestic violence, but the good statement is eroded by the idea that a good sex life is a legitimate reason for someone to stay in an abusive relationship. It might seem less offensive to many considering that the victim is male and the attacker is female, but that doesn’t make it okay.
The issue of Bajor applying to join the Federation and some resistance among Bajorans to that is raised. I think I’ve briefly discussed this before. I believe that the Federation is a good thing and should be expanded and would be helpful for Bajor as they get back on their feet after the Cardassian occupation.
I give it two stars out of five.
“Return to Grace” See this for a plot summary.
A very non-political episode. There’s some discussion of bigotry- about how a half-Cardassian, half-Bajoran woman is unwelcome in both societies.
Overall a good episode, I give it three stars out of five.
“Sons of Mogh” See this for a plot summary.
This episode is largely non-political but includes one reference to the limits of multi-culturalism. Although there might be some exceptions on either side of this, customs which violate a nation’s laws should not be tolerated- there might be some customs which violate laws and should be respected anyway (the laws should be modified), and some customs which should be banned with new laws. One good example I can think of is female circumcision. I haven’t read about it in a long time, but I believe that it is wrong and should be banned.
I give it two stars out of five.
“Bar Association” See this for a plot summary.
A very political episode and one of the most progressive ST episodes made. It’s explicitly pro-union. There’s also reason to believe that the Federation and Starfleet are pro-union, as Sisko orders Odo to not interfere with the strikers and pressures Quark to negotiate with them. We also learn more about how raw Ferengi capitalism is.
The Ferengi Commerce Authority, which arrives to help Quark break the strike, is apparently able and willing to go very far. They threaten the strikers with fines against their relatives and the seizing of their financial accounts and also with death. They also openly use physical intimidation of the strikers with notorious Nausicaans and beat up someone the strike leader cares about and seem on the verge of killing the strike leader when the strike is resolved.
On the other hand, the Ferengi staff indicate that they still have a lot of respect for capitalism, talking about how they want to BECOME the exploiters and how they want to increase their profits (it wasn’t a reference to profit sharing). But that’s because they’re Ferengi.
Overall it’s very pro-labor. As usual whatever is considered “normal” for Ferengis is portrayed negatively and as in conflict with the Federation. The strikers seem to get a lot of popular support from the station’s population.
I give it four stars out of five.
Monday, August 3, 2009
Six new songs
I have six more songs. They're all "Those Lyrics," for an explanation see this. I might have a new source of non-offensive material for altering, but if not from now on it'll probably be something like 90% "Those Lyrics."
Also, two of these songs are SHARP/RASH songs, you might want to read the introductory portion of the first post I did with that sort of song/poem.
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
The ones towards the top are okay, the ones towards the bottom are good.
1. We Fly the Starry Plough. Republican Socialists in Ireland.
2. The Hate Froze. The Eastern European part of WWII.
3. When Partition Falls. Partly about a vision for a United Ireland.
4. SHARP Skinheads. Anti-racist skinheads.
5. Slan Abhaile. N. Ireland.
“We fly the Starry Plough” based on “we fly the swastika” by No Remorse. Original lyrics are here.
1. The Starry Plough is the flag of republican socialism.
2. Considering the source of the original, I feel like I have to point out what is probably obvious: as long as it doesn't cross a certain line (and in N. Ireland I imagine it rarely does) Irish pride is very different from White pride. (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
3. Volunteers are members of republican paramilitaries.
**4. 25% of this version is me, 75% is the original.
5. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
6. I'm not sure if I should have retained the bit about an era of darkness in my version. But "era of darkness" is basically in the right neighborhood- even today, with the economic situation and the continuation of British rule (albeit less so than before).
7. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
8. No Remorse was supportive of the Unionist and British causes in N. Ireland.
9. This is about republican socialists, but only 1-2 lines are about those who use arms.
it’s a symbol of power, it’s a symbol of pride
in the hands of the Irish republican it evokes something deep inside
Chorus
we fly the starry plough, to London we won’t submit
we ain’t never going to take it down for no unionist or Brit
in this era of darkness, it’s a symbol of light
it’ll make a thousand strong Volunteers raise their fists and fight
Chorus
when you see our banners high, rally ‘round and cheer
only the crown forces have something to fear
Chorus
*****
There used to be a poem here called "Real Skinhead." It might be back soon.
*****
“The Hate Froze” based on “The Snow Fell” by Skrewdriver, original lyrics are here.
1. The original is about, from a pro-Nazi perspective, the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union which was dealt a fatal blow early on by the Russian Winter.
2. I skipped the first verse, which was about Stalin. I don’t like him, which is why I couldn’t flip it and I wasn’t going to leave it, so I’m ignoring it.
3. As the war went bad for the Nazis, there were more and more plots against Hitler.
4. The red flag in Berlin warms my heart because it represents the defeat of Nazi Germany.
**5. 15% of this version is me, 85% is the original.
6. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
7. I inspired someone on the Southern Poverty Law Center's blog to alter this song, and he did an even better job than I did. You can see his song in the comments.
UPDATE 11/27/10 8. I just realized that I'm pretty sure almost no one points to the Winter just outside Moscow as the moment when the defeat of the Nazis began. I might change that line.
8. UPDATE 12/24/10 I just added "there" to the 2nd line of the 2nd verse.
9. UPDATE 1/28/11 I am not a fan of the Soviet Union, but considering what they went through during the War, it's appropriate here and there to remember their contribution to the Allied victory.
They took the old roads that Napoleon had taken before.
They fought as a force of hate against the world in a fascist war.
One day they were looking around and the sun was shining on the cold flowers.
The next day they were freezing to death in the sleet and the ice cold showers.
(chorus)
And the snow fell
covering the hate of their ideals.
And the snow fell
freezing the blood and the wheels.
And the snow fell
it was the beginning of their defeat
And the snow fell
soon it would be complete
Then came the deadly roads back from the steppes of their retreat.
The cold racked their bodies but even better, there was the pain of defeat.
Many people who had hailed them once now turned and looked away.
These people now knew that Berlin’s defeat was on it's way.
(chorus)
they were finally pushed back to the borders of their fatherland.
Now assassins came heroes everywhere at hand.
Many Soviets had fought and died knowing that they had to win.
It still warms my heart to see the picture of the red flag in Berlin.
(chorus)
****
“When Partition Falls” based on “When The Hammer Falls” by Bound for Glory, original lyrics are here.
0. Partition is the division of Ireland.
1. The SDLP are the Social Democratic and Labour Party, Sinn Fein’s moderate rival in the nationalist community. I explain what’s wrong with them here.
2. Chinooks are UK military helicopters and are used here as a symbol of the British military.
3. The crooked cross is the swastika.
4. The red, white and blue are the colors of the British flag.
5. The ending of partition will strengthen various left, progressive, liberal and working-class movements in Ireland. I go into that more in the last 1/5 of this post.
6. There’s not a bad chance that when Ireland is united, a republican organization will be in a government with other parties of the Left.
7. There’s some large minority of republicans who support legalizing marijuana (dope is meant as a reference to marijuana, not drugs in general) (you could say this song is about that minority). (there's also a similar situation regarding abortion)
**7. 71% of this version is me, 29% is the original (a new record).
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. Since the original is American, I DID include some anti-hate stuff, see this for why that's important.
10. Initially this poem had some problems because it was kind of about Sinn Fein. I have now corrected that, and it is about a left-wing element of the republican family overall.
11. UPDATE 1/28/11 As far as I can tell, there's probably some small minority of republicans who are VERY Catholic, probably another small minority who are fairly Catholic, and probably a large minority who are atheist. And this poem is about the left-wingers, so it makes even more sense since there's probably not many republicans who are both very Catholic and left-wing.
12. UPDATE 1/28/11 Obviously republicans have been marching on the street for a long time, but more mass struggle will probably-definitely be part of republicans uniting Ireland and/or forming a republican-left government.
13 UPDATE 5/9/20 I deleted the last two "the" in the last line of the first verse.
SDLP fools and Unionist tools
We all live by London’s rules
Take a better look, up at the Chinooks
how many lives have they took?
Those of the crooked cross, in 1945 they lost
We’ll defeat them at any cost
we’re turning the screws, and we do refuse
to submit to the red, white and blue
Chorus:
From the visions that we saw, there will come new laws
When partition falls
With the power of pride, she’ll take a bride
When partition falls
for the women of Ireland, abortion on demand
When partition falls
For the working-class, justice at last
When partition falls
The future looks bleak, for those who think we are weak
the truth we will always speak
We have hope but no not from the Pope
We do support legalizing dope
we won’t Surrender, retreat, or cower in defeat
What will you do when we march on the streets?
We are what’s coming, our victory will be stunning
in a left coalition, the government we’ll be running
******
“SHARP Skinheads” based on “OC Skinhead” by Final War original lyrics are here.
1. Lincoln Brigade refers to the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, the group of American volunteers who fought fascism in Spain’s Civil War.
2. SHARP is SkinHeads Against Racial Prejudice.
**3. 39% of this version is me, 61% is the original.
4. I give this song/poem four stars out of five.
5. The class I refer to is the working-class.
6. 10/31/10 I just replaced the word "march" with the word "live" in the 5th line of the first verse.
We were born for anti-fash crusades
to follow the steps of the Lincoln brigade
born to fight and born to win,
we are all anti-racist Skins
we are the ones who live on the streets
our voices loud and never discreet
it's our battle in a people’s war
we are stronger than before
SHARP....Skinheads
Steel capped boots, fisted hands
an anti-racist scene and anti-racist bands
carry our banners hold ‘em above,
we'll fight for the class that we all love
drink some beer and hit the town,
find some Nazis and beat them down
comrades united across the states
we fight together against the hate
SHARP...Skinheads
yeah, We were born for anti-fash crusades
we all remember the Lincoln brigade
we've said it before let the battle begin
victory is ours you know we'll win
Fists and boots and our brains
we’ll defeat those who want fascist reign
shaven heads and opposition to hate
nazis better fuck off before it's too late
SHARP ...Skinheads
****
“Slan Abhaile” based on “When the Boat comes in” by Skrewdriver, original lyrics are here.
1. The title is an Irish farewell to someone traveling home. There’s a republican mural that shows a British army soldier walking away towards (I think) the sunset (there's a sign saying that England is that way), with those words at the top. It’s sort of a friendlier spin on the slogan “Brits out.” My version of this song is a bit less friendly, but I like that republican mural and wanted to use that phrase.
2. Historically there’s been a left-wing analysis that British business operating in Ireland benefit from the way that partition (and in the North the sectarianism that goes with partition) weakens organized labor and the left.
3. This is set in the 1980s and 1990s when the republican strategy of the “Ballot and the armalite (rifle)” was being used.
4. Squaddie is a term for British Army soldier.
5. Special Branch is a part of the police in Britain and Ireland, sort of comparable to the FBI. The SB of the N. Ireland police during the conflict was involved in collusion with loyalist paramilitaries. I explain that more around 2/5 the way through this post.
6. The Red Hand is a loyalist symbol.
**7. 56% of this version is me and 44% is the original.
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. Skrewdriver was supportive of the Unionist and British causes in N. Ireland.
10. Except for the last five lines, this could include nationalists and of course unarmed republicans, but those last 5 lines are about the IRA.
we won’t take shit, from the Brits, cause Ireland does rule
We will fight the tories, 'cos tories are all fools
Try to run our nation, and give it to fat cats
We won't take it anymore, we're taking our nation back
(Chorus)
Squaddie, Squaddie, get on that boat
Squaddie, Squaddie, row
Squaddie, Squaddie, get out of here
Squaddie, Squaddie, go, go, go...
They patrol the Irish streets, they're dividing our Irish land
And the bigots in Special Branch give aid to the Red Hand
Give them guns, give them info, ignore our human rights
We won't stand and watch our people be slaughtered without a fight
Chorus
We've got to love this land of ours, and fight to make it free
One day we’ll win just like our comrades in the ANC
And if we have to we will fight all the way to the end
between the ballot and the armalite we’ll make them comprehand
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 75% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
Also, two of these songs are SHARP/RASH songs, you might want to read the introductory portion of the first post I did with that sort of song/poem.
For the rest of the poems click on the "lyrics" label at the bottom (there are at least two pages worth of posts, so click on the "older posts" at the bottom of the first page).
The ones towards the top are okay, the ones towards the bottom are good.
1. We Fly the Starry Plough. Republican Socialists in Ireland.
2. The Hate Froze. The Eastern European part of WWII.
3. When Partition Falls. Partly about a vision for a United Ireland.
4. SHARP Skinheads. Anti-racist skinheads.
5. Slan Abhaile. N. Ireland.
“We fly the Starry Plough” based on “we fly the swastika” by No Remorse. Original lyrics are here.
1. The Starry Plough is the flag of republican socialism.
2. Considering the source of the original, I feel like I have to point out what is probably obvious: as long as it doesn't cross a certain line (and in N. Ireland I imagine it rarely does) Irish pride is very different from White pride. (I just heard something making me think that it's probably a small minority of northern nationalists that would talk about "Irish pride"; I still feel odd completely re-writing that line, so I'm going to keep it)
3. Volunteers are members of republican paramilitaries.
**4. 25% of this version is me, 75% is the original.
5. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
6. I'm not sure if I should have retained the bit about an era of darkness in my version. But "era of darkness" is basically in the right neighborhood- even today, with the economic situation and the continuation of British rule (albeit less so than before).
7. This poem is not meant as an endorsement of armed struggle since 1997.
8. No Remorse was supportive of the Unionist and British causes in N. Ireland.
9. This is about republican socialists, but only 1-2 lines are about those who use arms.
it’s a symbol of power, it’s a symbol of pride
in the hands of the Irish republican it evokes something deep inside
Chorus
we fly the starry plough, to London we won’t submit
we ain’t never going to take it down for no unionist or Brit
in this era of darkness, it’s a symbol of light
it’ll make a thousand strong Volunteers raise their fists and fight
Chorus
when you see our banners high, rally ‘round and cheer
only the crown forces have something to fear
Chorus
*****
There used to be a poem here called "Real Skinhead." It might be back soon.
*****
“The Hate Froze” based on “The Snow Fell” by Skrewdriver, original lyrics are here.
1. The original is about, from a pro-Nazi perspective, the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union which was dealt a fatal blow early on by the Russian Winter.
2. I skipped the first verse, which was about Stalin. I don’t like him, which is why I couldn’t flip it and I wasn’t going to leave it, so I’m ignoring it.
3. As the war went bad for the Nazis, there were more and more plots against Hitler.
4. The red flag in Berlin warms my heart because it represents the defeat of Nazi Germany.
**5. 15% of this version is me, 85% is the original.
6. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
7. I inspired someone on the Southern Poverty Law Center's blog to alter this song, and he did an even better job than I did. You can see his song in the comments.
UPDATE 11/27/10 8. I just realized that I'm pretty sure almost no one points to the Winter just outside Moscow as the moment when the defeat of the Nazis began. I might change that line.
8. UPDATE 12/24/10 I just added "there" to the 2nd line of the 2nd verse.
9. UPDATE 1/28/11 I am not a fan of the Soviet Union, but considering what they went through during the War, it's appropriate here and there to remember their contribution to the Allied victory.
They took the old roads that Napoleon had taken before.
They fought as a force of hate against the world in a fascist war.
One day they were looking around and the sun was shining on the cold flowers.
The next day they were freezing to death in the sleet and the ice cold showers.
(chorus)
And the snow fell
covering the hate of their ideals.
And the snow fell
freezing the blood and the wheels.
And the snow fell
it was the beginning of their defeat
And the snow fell
soon it would be complete
Then came the deadly roads back from the steppes of their retreat.
The cold racked their bodies but even better, there was the pain of defeat.
Many people who had hailed them once now turned and looked away.
These people now knew that Berlin’s defeat was on it's way.
(chorus)
they were finally pushed back to the borders of their fatherland.
Now assassins came heroes everywhere at hand.
Many Soviets had fought and died knowing that they had to win.
It still warms my heart to see the picture of the red flag in Berlin.
(chorus)
****
“When Partition Falls” based on “When The Hammer Falls” by Bound for Glory, original lyrics are here.
0. Partition is the division of Ireland.
1. The SDLP are the Social Democratic and Labour Party, Sinn Fein’s moderate rival in the nationalist community. I explain what’s wrong with them here.
2. Chinooks are UK military helicopters and are used here as a symbol of the British military.
3. The crooked cross is the swastika.
4. The red, white and blue are the colors of the British flag.
5. The ending of partition will strengthen various left, progressive, liberal and working-class movements in Ireland. I go into that more in the last 1/5 of this post.
6. There’s not a bad chance that when Ireland is united, a republican organization will be in a government with other parties of the Left.
7. There’s some large minority of republicans who support legalizing marijuana (dope is meant as a reference to marijuana, not drugs in general) (you could say this song is about that minority). (there's also a similar situation regarding abortion)
**7. 71% of this version is me, 29% is the original (a new record).
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. Since the original is American, I DID include some anti-hate stuff, see this for why that's important.
10. Initially this poem had some problems because it was kind of about Sinn Fein. I have now corrected that, and it is about a left-wing element of the republican family overall.
11. UPDATE 1/28/11 As far as I can tell, there's probably some small minority of republicans who are VERY Catholic, probably another small minority who are fairly Catholic, and probably a large minority who are atheist. And this poem is about the left-wingers, so it makes even more sense since there's probably not many republicans who are both very Catholic and left-wing.
12. UPDATE 1/28/11 Obviously republicans have been marching on the street for a long time, but more mass struggle will probably-definitely be part of republicans uniting Ireland and/or forming a republican-left government.
13 UPDATE 5/9/20 I deleted the last two "the" in the last line of the first verse.
SDLP fools and Unionist tools
We all live by London’s rules
Take a better look, up at the Chinooks
how many lives have they took?
Those of the crooked cross, in 1945 they lost
We’ll defeat them at any cost
we’re turning the screws, and we do refuse
to submit to the red, white and blue
Chorus:
From the visions that we saw, there will come new laws
When partition falls
With the power of pride, she’ll take a bride
When partition falls
for the women of Ireland, abortion on demand
When partition falls
For the working-class, justice at last
When partition falls
The future looks bleak, for those who think we are weak
the truth we will always speak
We have hope but no not from the Pope
We do support legalizing dope
we won’t Surrender, retreat, or cower in defeat
What will you do when we march on the streets?
We are what’s coming, our victory will be stunning
in a left coalition, the government we’ll be running
******
“SHARP Skinheads” based on “OC Skinhead” by Final War original lyrics are here.
1. Lincoln Brigade refers to the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, the group of American volunteers who fought fascism in Spain’s Civil War.
2. SHARP is SkinHeads Against Racial Prejudice.
**3. 39% of this version is me, 61% is the original.
4. I give this song/poem four stars out of five.
5. The class I refer to is the working-class.
6. 10/31/10 I just replaced the word "march" with the word "live" in the 5th line of the first verse.
We were born for anti-fash crusades
to follow the steps of the Lincoln brigade
born to fight and born to win,
we are all anti-racist Skins
we are the ones who live on the streets
our voices loud and never discreet
it's our battle in a people’s war
we are stronger than before
SHARP....Skinheads
Steel capped boots, fisted hands
an anti-racist scene and anti-racist bands
carry our banners hold ‘em above,
we'll fight for the class that we all love
drink some beer and hit the town,
find some Nazis and beat them down
comrades united across the states
we fight together against the hate
SHARP...Skinheads
yeah, We were born for anti-fash crusades
we all remember the Lincoln brigade
we've said it before let the battle begin
victory is ours you know we'll win
Fists and boots and our brains
we’ll defeat those who want fascist reign
shaven heads and opposition to hate
nazis better fuck off before it's too late
SHARP ...Skinheads
****
“Slan Abhaile” based on “When the Boat comes in” by Skrewdriver, original lyrics are here.
1. The title is an Irish farewell to someone traveling home. There’s a republican mural that shows a British army soldier walking away towards (I think) the sunset (there's a sign saying that England is that way), with those words at the top. It’s sort of a friendlier spin on the slogan “Brits out.” My version of this song is a bit less friendly, but I like that republican mural and wanted to use that phrase.
2. Historically there’s been a left-wing analysis that British business operating in Ireland benefit from the way that partition (and in the North the sectarianism that goes with partition) weakens organized labor and the left.
3. This is set in the 1980s and 1990s when the republican strategy of the “Ballot and the armalite (rifle)” was being used.
4. Squaddie is a term for British Army soldier.
5. Special Branch is a part of the police in Britain and Ireland, sort of comparable to the FBI. The SB of the N. Ireland police during the conflict was involved in collusion with loyalist paramilitaries. I explain that more around 2/5 the way through this post.
6. The Red Hand is a loyalist symbol.
**7. 56% of this version is me and 44% is the original.
8. I give this song/poem three stars out of five.
9. Skrewdriver was supportive of the Unionist and British causes in N. Ireland.
10. Except for the last five lines, this could include nationalists and of course unarmed republicans, but those last 5 lines are about the IRA.
we won’t take shit, from the Brits, cause Ireland does rule
We will fight the tories, 'cos tories are all fools
Try to run our nation, and give it to fat cats
We won't take it anymore, we're taking our nation back
(Chorus)
Squaddie, Squaddie, get on that boat
Squaddie, Squaddie, row
Squaddie, Squaddie, get out of here
Squaddie, Squaddie, go, go, go...
They patrol the Irish streets, they're dividing our Irish land
And the bigots in Special Branch give aid to the Red Hand
Give them guns, give them info, ignore our human rights
We won't stand and watch our people be slaughtered without a fight
Chorus
We've got to love this land of ours, and fight to make it free
One day we’ll win just like our comrades in the ANC
And if we have to we will fight all the way to the end
between the ballot and the armalite we’ll make them comprehand
One last note: Even with the songs that are only about 10% me (and at the upper end, one is 75% me), I have a request, although I don't have strong feelings or expectations about this. First, I want credit for these songs. Second, I'd appreciate it if the notes follow the lyrics around the internet. If you modify the lyrics further, please either make some notes for the changes if you leave some of my changes, or just provide a link to this URL so people can see my version. Although I'm not sure how many people will like what I'm doing with the lyrics, to one degree or another (depending on how much I changed them) I'm proud of these songs- and at the risk of getting a little personal, if people like the songs, I could really use the extra boost of getting credit for them right now (or if you don't like them, they were all written by Sarah Palin- that fascist, what kind of sick person enjoys altering racist lyrics?).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)